This is a decision recently posted regarding Sandra Ann Anderson A.K.A. Sandra-ann, Authorized representative A.K.A. Sandra-Ann: Anderson, A.K.A. SANDRA ANDERSON, WOMAN SANDRA OF THE ANDERSON FAMILY, A.K.A. i woman sandra-ann, acting as agent for and on behalf of SANDRA ANDERSON, A.K.A. sandra-ann:woman, A.K.A. Sandra-Ann, Executor, A.K.A. sandra-ann.
Ms. Anderson has been declared a vexatious litigant who files ridiculous claims. She is tried many scams and they are all explained in this opinion. You can and should read the opinion as you will become educated about the ridiculousness of this woman’s claims. I appreciate his identifying and explaining the “money for nothing” schemes, and other types of schemes attempted.
He notes that “pseudolaw is typically applied to evade income tax, as a “get out of jail free card”, to attack government and institutional actors, or as a way to purportedly nullify debts and get “money for nothing.”
He also notes that these tactics are abusive, have no merit, and while they may be done by some because they may “perceive they have no choice and adopt these futile measures out of desperation,” that is not true for everyone and in his opinion it was not true for Ms. Anderson. “She chose this path, of denying her debts, making fraudulent payments, pretending to hide behind her Strawwoman sock puppet, and purporting to unilaterally dictate terms to the Court and the Defendant.”
Judge Rooke has done an exceptional job outlining why this litigant was wrong and why. His insights and contributions, and those on his staff, are helping the world understand the nature of these types of people.
You can find the opinion here.