MR. Simon is currently incarcerated for sexual and violence charges.
He has argued that “there is a distinction between himself, as a “natural person” and the “legal person/corpus body” named in the warrant. From Mr Simon’s assertions that he could not be compelled to enter into any contract, we infer that he regards the authority of the court as a matter of consent by him and that since he does consent to be bound by the authority of the Court, the warrant is not a valid basis on which to detain him.”
The court recognizes this as a sovereign citizen argument and says that “they have no legal basis and cannot succeed.”
So far, this defense has not worked in any court.
You can read the opinion here.