In this opinion recently posted, Judge Rooke is discussing the case of a lawyer and her client who is on trial for cocaine trafficking. He explains why he has threatened to fine the lawyer for notarizing pseudo law documents.
What is important about Judge Rooke is that he explains his reasoning. He explains their wrongdoings and most importantly why they were wrong. Below are some notable lines from the opinion.
“Furthermore, the Strawman duality…is so thoroughly rejected, and is so notoriously false, that, in law, anyone who employs Strawman Theory is presumed to do so in bad faith, and for abusive, ulterior purposes.”
“I note the absurdity that someone claims to be “the heir” of himself, though it is not unique for an OPCA litigant to claim to “have killed off” his Strawman, and, on that basis, obtained extraordinary authority.”
“Notarizing documents in a pseudolaw context purportedly creates extraordinary rights, which is deeply problematic, given how pseudolaw affiliation is often linked with illegal, violent, and criminal conduct…People who adopt pseudolaw become an increased risk to others – and to themselves.”
I appreciate his insights into the pseudo legal mind.