Pseudolaw Litigant in Canada Loses Case

Spread the love

Sandra Ann Anderson has been engaging in a series of unsuccessful sovereign citizen tactics in Canada and the court is having none of it. She’s had multiple criminal charges she facing. Among others, you might remember her as the woman who tried to smuggle horses into Canada.

There are some very quotable lines from the court record. A couple of my favorites:

  • Pseudolaw is promoted as a commercial product by fraudsters, “pseudolaw gurus”, who purport to teach a hidden, secret law that defeats government authorities, and provides a lifestyle of “do as I please” and “take what I want.”
  • Ms. Anderson has engaged in pseudolaw arguments taught by US guru Carl (Karl) Lentz, and then has claimed to be the trustee for a non-existent trust with her name in all capital letters. Ms. Anderson then roleplays both herself and her sock puppet “SANDRA ANDERSON TRUST” as two allegedly separate entities.
  • …anyone who employs Strawman Theory is presumed to do so in bad faith, and for abusive, ulterior purposes
  • This misconduct has not assisted Ms. Anderson one iota, though it seems plausible that, at least, several OPCA gurus are making significant income charging Ms. Anderson for their worthless services.

I am always impressed with these rulings, the thought put into explaining the case and the court’s unwillingness to tolerate these tactics. We, in the US, should follow suit. You can read the case here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *